[AISWorld] ToC International Journal of Knowledge Management 11(1)

MurphJen at aol.com MurphJen at aol.com
Sat Jul 11 04:17:45 EDT 2015


The  contents of the latest issue of:
International  Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM)
Volume  11, Issue 1, January - March 2015
Published:  Quarterly in Print and Electronically
ISSN:  1548-0666; EISSN: 1548-0658; 
Published  by IGI Global Publishing, Hershey, USA
_www.igi-global.com/ijkm_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/journal/international-journal-knowledge-management-ijkm/1083)   
Editor-in-Chief:  Murray E. Jennex (San Diego State University, USA)Note:  
There are no submission or acceptance fees for manuscripts submitted to the  
International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM). All manuscripts are  
accepted based on a double-blind peer review editorial process.  
ARTICLE  1 
The  Influence of Individual Characteristics on Knowledge Sharing 
Practices,  Enablers, and Barriers in a Project Management Context 
Laila  N. Marouf (Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait), Omar E. M. 
Khalil  (Department of Quantitative Methods & Information Systems, College of  
Business Administration, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait) 
The  knowledge management (KM) literature in general is short on field 
evidence  concerning knowledge sharing (KS) practices in project management 
settings,  where knowledge occupies a central place. In addition, research on KS 
enablers  and barriers has largely overlooked the fact that individual 
characteristics may  influence the choice to share knowledge. This research 
explored departmental KS  practices, enablers and barriers at a Middle-Eastern 
project management company.  It also investigated the influence of a number 
of individual characteristics on  KS, enablers and barriers. The findings 
confirm that Knowledge is partially  shared within departments, and the 
employees have varying views on KS enablers  and barriers. Although many do not 
perceive organizational enablers as catalysts  for KS, they somewhat believe 
that the information technology (IT) enablers do  facilitate KS. The 
employees, however, do not believe that the identified  individual, organizational 
and IT barriers hinder KS. In addition, gender, age,  department type and job 
type have varying effects on the perceived KS practices,  organizational 
enablers, and IT enablers and barriers. These findings and their  implications 
are further discussed in the paper. 
To  obtain a copy of the entire article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/article/the-influence-of-individual-characteristics-on-k
nowledge-sharing-practices-enablers-and-barriers-in-a-project-management-con
text/130706_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/article/the-influence-of-individual-characteristics-on-knowledge-sharing-practices-enablers-and-barriers-in-a-pr
oject-management-context/130706)  
To  read a PDF sample of this article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130706_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130706)  
ARTICLE  2 
Rethinking  Knowledge Sharing Barriers: A Content Analysis of 103 Studies 
Simon  Cleveland (Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences, 
Nova  Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale-Davie, FL, USA), Timothy J. Ellis 
 (Graduate School of Computer and Information Sciences, Nova Southeastern  
University, Ft. Lauderdale-Davie, FL, USA) 
The  current work force will not only lose 3.6 million “baby boomers” by 
2020, but  also a substantial organizational knowledge. Presently, there is a 
gap in  understanding how to promote effective organizational knowledge 
sharing due to  the limited awareness of factors that inhibit knowledge sharing 
behaviors. The  focus of this article is to explore the most commonly noted 
barriers to  employees' knowledge seeking and knowledge contributing 
practices and extract  potential factors that influence these barriers. A content 
analysis study is  performed on 103 knowledge management articles from ten 
computer and information  science databases. The results demonstrate a clear 
division between the barriers  limiting each specific behavior: knowledge 
seeking behaviors depend largely on  the time availability of knowledge 
seekers, while poor communication skills and  lack of trust appear to be the major 
inhibitors to knowledge contribution. Three  main factors were found to 
influence these barriers: role conflict, role  ambiguity and locus of control. 
The findings are consistent with the information  foraging and social 
exchange theories. Implications for future research are  proposed. 
To  obtain a copy of the entire article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/article/rethinking-knowledge-sharing-barriers/130707_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/article/rethinking-knowledge-sharing-barriers/13070
7)  
To  read a PDF sample of this article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130707_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130707)  
ARTICLE  3 
The  Negative Performance Implications of Industry Dynamism on 
Organizational  Knowledge 
James  M. Bloodgood (Department of Management, College of Business 
Administration,  Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA) 
Organizational  knowledge is a key component of organizational efficiency 
and effectiveness, and  ultimately success. The use of organizational 
knowledge is not always a  conscious endeavor, and this can lead to the use of 
knowledge at inappropriate  times or in inappropriate ways, particularly under 
changing conditions. To  investigate the potential for ineffectual knowledge 
use, this study examines how  organizational knowledge influences 
organizational performance when there is a  high degree of industry dynamism. Using a 
sample of 105 U.S. firms from 46  industries, this study finds that industry 
dynamism moderates the relationship  between organizational knowledge and 
organizational performance. Specifically,  higher levels of dynamism weaken 
the positive effect of organizational knowledge  on organizational 
performance. Implications for researchers and practitioners of  this finding are 
discussed. 
To  obtain a copy of the entire article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/article/the-negative-performance-implications-of-industr
y-dynamism-on-organizational-knowledge/130708_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/article/the-negative-performance-implications-of-industry-dynamism-on-organiza
tional-knowledge/130708)  
To  read a PDF sample of this article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130708_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130708)  
ARTICLE  4 
Measuring  Knowledge Enablers and Project Success in IT Organizations 
Donald  S. McKay II (Forbes School of Business at Ashford University, San 
Diego, CA,  USA), Timothy J. Ellis (Graduate School of Computer and 
Information Sciences,  Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale-Davie, FL, USA) 
Knowledge  enablers exist at the organizational and project levels. There 
is however, no  meaningful means to measure organizational or project 
knowledge sharing. The  need to understand the elements that enable this flow of 
knowledge is  dramatically evidenced in information technology organizations 
in which  insufficient knowledge sharing leads to intellectual capital loss, 
rework,  skills deterioration, and repeated mistakes that increase project 
costs or  failures. The goal of this study was to examine the relationship 
among knowledge  sharing processes at the organizational level – 
organizational learning enablers  (OLEs) – the project level – project learning enablers 
(PLEs) – and project  success variables (PSVs). After identifying and 
validating the OLE, PLE, and PSV  constructs they were codified in a survey. 
Results showed a positive and  significant relationship among OLEs, PLEs, and 
PSVs. A multiple regression  indicated that the combination of OLEs and PLEs 
accounted for 30% of a project's  success, however, PLEs alone were not 
statistically significant. 
To  obtain a copy of the entire article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/article/measuring-knowledge-enablers-and-project-success
-in-it-organizations/130709_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/article/measuring-knowledge-enablers-and-project-success-in-it-organizations/130709)  
To  read a PDF sample of this article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130709_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130709)  
ARTICLE  5 
Reconceptualizing  the Knowledge Hierarchy for Management Education 
William  Acar (Graduate School of Management, Kent State University, Kent, 
OH, USA),  Susan V. Iverson (Higher Education Administration & Student 
Personnel,  College of Education, Health, & Human Services, Kent State 
University, Kent,  OH, USA), Rami S. Al-Gharaibeh (Faculty of Computer & Information  
Technology, J ordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan) 
Education  is undergoing a crisis. Among the several remedial approaches 
proposed, this  article contributes to the promotion of structured teaching 
for constructed  knowing. One of the neglected areas of concern in the current 
education  revolution is the structure of knowledge itself. The 
Data-Information-Knowledge  (DIK) hierarchy was originally suggested to explain the 
differences between the  three levels of knowledge; however, it does not 
capture them very well. Aiming  at re-conceptualizing the DIK hierarchy from an 
up-to- date knowledge  acquisition and management perspective, the authors 
start by making an argument  for splitting each of the data and information 
levels into two. Instead of  simply data, the authors propose the two levels of 
raw data and processed data.  Likewise, they propose the two levels of 
potential information and actual  information. Since knowledge expressions of 
other individuals constitute another  source of potential information, they 
replace the three new levels of raw data,  processed data and potential 
information with a single level, which they call  the environment, and that 
embraces all means of acquiring information, whether  through data collection and 
processing or potential information filtering. The  authors thus propose a 
framework of knowledge acquisition based on an  
Environment-Information-Knowledge (EIK) hierarchy more indicative of actual  teaching and learning 
processes. 
To  obtain a copy of the entire article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/article/reconceptualizing-the-knowledge-hierarchy-for-ma
nagement-education/130710_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/article/reconceptualizing-the-knowledge-hierarchy-for-management-education/130710)  
To  read a PDF sample of this article, click on the link below.
_www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130710_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/viewtitlesample.aspx?id=130710)  
 
____________________________________
For  full copies of the above articles, check for this issue of the 
International  Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM) in your institution's 
library. This  journal is also included in the IGI Global 
aggregated"InfoSci-Journals" database: _www.igi-global.com/isj_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/e-resources/infosci-databases/infosci-journals/) .    
____________________________________
  
CALL  FOR PAPERS 
Mission  of IJKM: 
The  primary objective of the International Journal of Knowledge  
Management (IJKM) is to  provide a comprehensive cross discipline forum for advancing 
the understanding  of the organizational, technical, human, and cognitive 
issues associated with  the creation, capture, transfer and use of knowledge 
in organizations. The  secondary objective of this Journal is to share 
knowledge among researchers and  practitioners with respect to the design, 
development, implementation and  maintenance of effective knowledge management 
systems. The journal publishes  high quality empirical and theoretical research 
covering all aspects of  knowledge management. In addition to full-length 
research manuscripts, the  journal publishes insightful research and practice 
notes as well as case studies  from all areas of knowledge management. 
Indices  of IJKM: 
    *   ACM Digital Library 
    *   Australian Business Deans  Council (ABDC) 
    *   Bacon's Media  Directory 
    *   Burrelle's Media  Directory 
    *   Cabell's Directories 
    *   Compendex (Elsevier  Engineering Index) 
    *   CSA Illumina 
    *   DBLP 
    *   DEST Register of Refereed  Journals 
    *   Gale Directory of  Publications & Broadcast Media 
    *   GetCited 
    *   Google Scholar  
    *   INSPEC 
    *   JournalTOCs 
    *   KnowledgeBoard 
    *   Library & Information  Science Abstracts (LISA) 
    *   MediaFinder 
    *   Norwegian Social Science  Data Services (NSD) 
    *   PsycINFO® 
    *   SCOPUS 
    *   The Index of Information  Systems Journals 
    *   The Standard Periodical  Directory 
    *   Ulrich's Periodicals  Directory
Coverage  of IJKM: 
The International Journal of Knowledge  Management (IJKM) covers all  
aspects of the knowledge management discipline, from organizational issues to  
technology support to knowledge representation. High quality submissions are  
encouraged using any qualitative or quantitative research methodology.  
Submissions are especially encouraged covering the following topics:

    *   Basic theories associated  with knowledge creation, knowledge 
management, and organizational memory 
    *   Case studies of knowledge  management and organizational memory 
systems 
    *   Cognitive theories of  knowledge management and organizational 
memory 
    *   Design of information and  communication systems that facilitate 
knowledge transfer and sharing 
    *   Enablers and inhibitors of  knowledge sharing and knowledge 
transfer behaviors 
    *   Global issues in knowledge  management and organizational memory 
    *   Issues related to the  capture, storage, search, retrieval, and use 
of knowledge and organizational  memory 
    *   Knowledge acquisition and  transfer processes 
    *   Knowledge management in  small and medium enterprises 
    *   Knowledge management  strategy 
    *   Knowledge management  training issues 
    *   Knowledge reuse in  organizations 
    *   Knowledge transfer and  sharing behaviors within emergent 
organizational forms such as virtual  communities 
    *   Methodologies and  processes for developing knowledge management 
systems 
    *   Metrics and effectiveness  of knowledge management and 
organizational memory systems 
    *   Organizational and  economic incentive structures for knowledge 
sharing and use 
    *   Organizational culture  impacts on knowledge management 
    *   Organizational  learning 
    *   Use of semantic networks,  topic maps, the Internet, digital 
documents, XML, taxonomies, ontologies, and  other technologies to implement 
knowledge management systems
Interested  authors should consult the journal's manuscript submission 
guidelines 
_www.igi-global.com/calls-for-papers/international-journal-knowledge-management-ijkm/1083_ 
(http://www.igi-global.com/calls-for-papers/international-journal-knowledge-management-ijkm/1083) 


More information about the AISWorld mailing list