[AISWorld] Influential IS Papers Discourse - Part 3 Nominate papers

Tue Aug 2 07:19:06 EDT 2016

Just a note to draw your attention to the three volume series Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems edited by Leslie Willcocks, Chris sauer and Mary Lacity and published by Springer Nature.  The three volumes include some interesting material related to our debate.
Frank Land

-----Original Message-----
From: AISWorld [mailto:aisworld-bounces at lists.aisnet.org] On Behalf Of mmora at securenym.net
Sent: 02 August 2016 08:50
To: aisworld at lists.aisnet.org; MurphJen at aol.com
Cc: profsamir1 at gmail.com
Subject: Re: [AISWorld] Influential IS Papers Discourse - Part 3 Nominate papers

Murray, we are in the same crusade! On making the current MIS field more engineering alike! New PhD and junior Faculty must be aware of bias and core weakness of our discipline. Manuel PS kind greetings from a short research stay in Germany where Informatics research is rooted and framed by engineering issues. And where nuclear science was achieved ! (Plank, Einstein, Oppenheiner borned in USA but from German parents and with PhD in Gottingen University in Germany, and finally no nuclear but the inventor of the NASA top Apollo projects von Braun also from Germany). And Nuclear energy plants are now forbidden in Germany by green reasons! We need more culture in this academic list and understand that the world is more than USA viewpoint.
On Tue, August 2, 2016 2:27 am, MurphJen at aol.com wrote:
> Yes Manuel, software engineering is less, however I think 20 years 
> experience as a nuclear/mechanical engineer and holding a Professional 
> Engineering license kind of supercedes any of those concerns on less  
> engineering
>
>
> In a message dated 8/1/2016 11:21:29 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
> dr.manuel.mora.uaa at gmail.com writes:
>
> Murray, it is positive. However, software engineering is the less 
> engineering (none use equations, numerical methods, or even 
> decision-making procedures for instance in AKM topic at present in the 
> most practice vs other engineering field like your BSc). On Design 
> Research, you can also refer to  big omission on Axiomatic Design 
> theory, actually for mechanical engineering and available from the 
> 1990. Other example, MISQ published in 1999 a paper on SwE by using 
> System Dynamics for PM issues but the same author had published  its 
> core ideas in 1989! So my critique and concerns on a real involvement 
> in a  systems engineering viewpoint. Anyway, the bias is the rule in 
> MIS research.  Manuel PS my BS is on computer systems 84, MSc on AI 
> 89, and EngD 03, and  my involvement in computer field is since 1976 
> programming Basic in Commodore  pc (from a friend by the way!) in high 
> school level in Mexico. On Aug 2, 2016 7:36 AM, <_MurphJen at aol.com_
> (mailto:MurphJen at aol.com) >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Manuel,
>
>
> I hope to reassure you.  Although my PhD is in MIS I have a MS in 
> software engineering as well as having spent 20 years as a 
> mechanical/nuclear engineer in the US Navy and the civilian nuclear 
> industry.  I got into MIS by pioneering the use of the PC. LANs, and 
> sensors in nuclear plants for doing testing.  I'm also well versed  as 
> a practitioner as I have traditional engineering certification (I'm a 
> Professional Engineer, Mechanical in the state of California), 
> industry  certified in IS security (I have the CISSP and CSSLP), and 
> in project  management (PMP).  Additionally I have undergraduate 
> degrees in  chemistry and physics and am the editor in chief of the 
> International  Journal of Knowledge Management and co-editor in chief 
> of the International  Journal of Information Systems for Crisis 
> Response and Management so I have  more interdisciplinary background 
> than most.  Hope this helps...murray  jennex
>
>
> In a message dated 8/1/2016 10:54:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, 
> _dr.manuel.mora.uaa at gmail.com_ (mailto:dr.manuel.mora.uaa at gmail.com)
> writes:
>
>
> Samir, you are missed researchers trained in engineering  (exception 
> by
> you) issues in this ad hoc panel. Design research is  older than 
> reported in MIS published papers. However, the posited  structure of 
> metrics looks good. Best success with this effort! It is  necessary to 
> reimpulse our discipline, Manuel On Aug 1, 2016 7:27  PM, "Samir 
> Chatterjee" <_profsamir1 at gmail.com_
> (mailto:profsamir1 at gmail.com) > wrote:
>
>
>> Dear  Colleagues,
>>
>>
>> A small ad hoc panel comprising of IS scholars  from all continents 
>> have come together to further this important  discussion about 
>> influence of IS research. Together we have come  up with a way to 
>> value the impact or influence. The attached PDF  file shows the 
>> metric but I am also providing it  below.
>>
>> We encourage all of you to nominate papers that you  think has had 
>> tremendous impact or influence to field and society.  In order to 
>> manage  this process and also in lieu of the time and  effort that 
>> might be
> required
>> to handle this nomination, please  adhere to the following rule:
>>
>> 1. Send us a soft copy of  the paper (PDF preferred).
>> 2. Fill up the influence metric table  as shown.
>> 3. You can self nominate your own paper(s) but no one  author can 
>> nominate more than 5 of his/her own paper. 4.  You must write a 100 
>> word explanation of why this paper that you nominated is worthy of 
>> consideration.
>>
>> Academic  Metrics
>>
>>
>> Number of Citations
>>
>>
>> 1 (1-100); 2  (100 â€“ 1000); 3 (1000+)
>>
>>
>> Number of Years since  publication
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Perceived quality of the  journal/conference
>>
>>
>> 1 (low)â€™ 2 (medium); 3  (high)
>>
>>
>> External grants funding the  research
>>
>>
>> NSF or NIH or DARPA or EU or other  private
>>
>>
>> Other disciplines using the idea in the  research
>>
>>
>> Yes (1); No  (0)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Industry/Practice  Metrics
>>
>>
>> Patents issued or filed
>>
>>
>> Yes (1);  No (0)
>>
>>
>> Actual intervention in field or site (Action  Research or Design
>> research)
>>
>> Yes (1); No  (0)
>>
>>
>> Commercialization of idea into  product/service
>>
>>
>> Yes (1); No (0)
>>
>>
>> Startups  created based on the idea
>>
>>
>> Yes (1); No  (0)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Influence on Society  (qualitative or subjective data)
>>
>>
>> Benefit of research to  scientific community
>>
>>
>> 1 (low); 2 (medium); 3  (high)
>>
>>
>> Benefit of research to society at  large
>>
>>
>> 1 (low); 2 (medium); 3  (high)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 100 word explanation of why this  paper is worthy of  consideration
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The panel consist of Prof. Robert M Davison, Prof. Murray Jennex, 
>> Prof.
>> Niels
>> BjÃ¸rn-Andersen, Prof. Steven B Sawyer, Prof.  Juhani Iivari and Prof.
>>
> Samir
>
>> Chatterjee.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Samir
>> --
>> Dr. Samir Chatterjee
>> Professor
>> School of Information Systems & Technology Claremont Graduate 
>> University
>> 130 East 9th Street, Claremont, CA  91711
>> (P) _909-607-4651_ (tel:909-607-4651) ; (cell) _909-730-8898_
>>
> (tel:909-730-8898)
>
>> _profsamir1 at gmail.com_ (mailto:profsamir1 at gmail.com) 
>> http://sites.cgu.edu/chatterjees/
>>
>>
>> Director, *Innovations Design Empowerment Applications Laboratory* 
>> (IDEA
>> Labs) http://www.idea-labs.net/
>> Associate Editor:  Health Systems, IJBDCN Editorial Board: Journal of 
>> AIS
>> Member: IEEE (senior), ACM (senior), AIS, AMIA
>> Author: http://designscienceresearch.wordpress.com/about/
>> 2015 Lifetime Achievement Award Winner for Contributions to Design
>>
> Science
>
>> (by AIS DSR community)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AISWorld mailing  list
>> _AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org_ (mailto:AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org)
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AISWorld  mailing list
> _AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org_ (mailto:AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AISWorld mailing list
> AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
>
>

_______________________________________________
AISWorld mailing list
AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org