[AISWorld] Influential IS Papers Discourse - Part 3 Nominate papers

MurphJen at aol.com MurphJen at aol.com
Tue Aug 2 15:39:04 EDT 2016


my only comment on media coverage is that it can be biased by a good PR  
person at the university, by that I mean that a good PR person can push out  
media releases and such that will get a person interviewed.  As an example  
we have a good a PR person and I typically do a couple of interviews a month 
on  my research or on topics of interest.  A little side note is that I did  
over 100 interviews during the Fukushima nuclear disaster, none tied to my  
research but all based on my knowledge.  I don't count that.  On the  other 
hand a student and I did a paper on how to identify victims of human sex  
trafficking using online advertising and have been interview a few times on 
it,  this would count but I'm not sure it reflects influence but rather an 
interest  in the topic.  This is very true for IS security researchers, we 
have the  most interesting research for media coverage....murray jennex
 
 
In a message dated 8/2/2016 10:52:33 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
profsamir1 at gmail.com writes:

Dear  Dennis, Bill & Manual,

I agree with Dennis that media coverage is a  testimony that the
work/research has permeated to the common masses, hence  it  is probably
valuable to society.

Manual, I hear what you  say however engineering and computer science are
very well established  disciplines. When we started the discourse on Design
Science Research, we  wanted to make sure that we as IS community can
distinguish what we do from  pure CS or Engineering. After all the nexus of
DSR comes from Herb Simon's  seminal work, emphasizing design. It is obvious
that certain engineering  theory or hard core technical CS work will not be
referenced in DSR  specially in the IS context. We as a community should
promote problem  solving but the source of our problems comes from the
intersection of  technology, people and organization. That's what
distinguishes us. In fact  I strongly suggest all senior editors in IS to
ask for "what problem did  you solve?" in their journal submissions. This
can strengthen our field and  showing evidence of value becomes easier. DSR
is meant to do that as a  research method.

Bill, you have a point. I have asked for papers since  we know that journal
and conference articles are peer reviewed. But you can  also propose a book
that you think has had influence. There are many other  artifacts that have
influence but without "peer" review it is difficult to  weed out which is
good and which is not. For example, someone may write a  blog or a newspaper
column that actually may be read by more IS folks than  some journal papers.
But one could argue that this is his/her opinion. We  live and work in a
system of "peer review". So as long as your work or  artifact has been
evaluated by others, please go ahead and submit your  nomination.

Sincerely
Samir


On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 6:18  PM, Galletta, Dennis <galletta at katz.pitt.edu>
wrote:

> This  is quite interesting. At the risk of beating this to death, as some
>  academics do, I think one additional measure should be added: Some  
measure
> of media coverage. If the media cares about it, then it seems  to add to 
the
> evidence of importance. It could work into your last two  measures in some
> way.
>
> I have heard some of Erik  Brynjolffsson's work described on NPR. I 
thought
> of this mainly  because of a few very short news articles from two or 
three
> of my  experiments in the past, but just look at the scale of Erik's
>  coverage! I did a couple of radio interviews on some local stations  and
> some excerpts related to a story of this new thing called the Web  on All
> Things Considered on NPR back in 1997 or 1998, and even that  was pretty
> exciting. I have also seen news reports that relate to work  by Carol
> Saunders as well. I'm sure many other IS professors have been  in the 
news,
> too.
>
> Maybe longer into the future, we  should consider measures of popular 
media
> like books and movies. For  instance, A Beautiful Mind, a movie that was
> based on Nash (2001) and,  of course, recently the Theory of Everything
> (Hawking). Maybe we will  see a movie about UTAUT someday, however, having
> four authors make it  more difficult!
>
> DG
>
>
>  
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Dennis F. Galletta                 Professor of Business
> Administration
>  University of Pittsburgh               and Director, Katz Doctoral
> Program
> 282a Mervis  Hall                     Katz Graduate School of
> Business
>  Phone +1 412-648-1699                 Pittsburgh,  PA
> 15260
> E-mail: galletta @            Fax +1
> 412-624-3633
>     katz.pitt.edu             homepage:
>  www.pitt.edu/~galletta
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: AISWorld  [mailto:aisworld-bounces at lists.aisnet.org] On Behalf Of
>  mmora at securenym.net
> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 7:52 PM
> To:  Samir Chatterjee <profsamir1 at gmail.com>
> Cc: ISWorld  <aisworld at lists.aisnet.org>
> Subject: Re: [AISWorld] Influential  IS Papers Discourse - Part 3 Nominate
> papers
>
> Well, an  additional evidence on strong bias on our disclipine, despite 
the
> good  wishes, on design research stream: axiomatic design theory (Suh,
>  1990), from MIT, widely used in several engineering fields, including
>  software engineering, has been ignored in MIS. This is a problem. Bias 
is  a
> strong dominant force in our discipline. This book (Suh, 1990)  qualifies
> totally the asked metrics but it has been missed in Design  Research in 
MIS.
> Manuel Mora / UAA, Mexico
>
> On Thu,  July 28, 2016 1:23 pm, Samir Chatterjee wrote:
> > Dear  Colleagues,
> >
> >
> > A small ad hoc panel  comprising of IS scholars from all continents
> > have come together  to further this important discussion about
> > influence of IS  research. Together we have come up with a way to value
> > the impact  or influence. The attached PDF file shows the metric but I
> > am  also providing  it below.
> >
> > We encourage all of  you to nominate papers that you think has had
> > tremendous impact  or influence to field and society. In order to
> > manage this  process and also in lieu of the time and effort that might
> > be  required to handle this nomination, please adhere to the following
>  rule:
> >
> > 1. Send us a soft copy of the paper (PDF  preferred).
> > 2. Fill up the influence metric table as  shown.
> > 3. You can self nominate your own paper(s) but no one  author can
> > nominate more than 5 of his/her own paper. 4. You must  write a 100
> > word explanation of why this paper that you nominated  is worthy of
> consideration.
> >
> > Academic  Metrics
> >
> >
> > Number of Citations
>  >
> >
> > 1 (1-100); 2 (100 – 1000); 3 (1000+)
>  >
> >
> > Number of Years since publication
>  >
> >
> >
> >
> > Perceived quality of  the journal/conference
> >
> >
> > 1 (low)’ 2  (medium); 3 (high)
> >
> >
> > External grants  funding the research
> >
> >
> > NSF or NIH or  DARPA or EU or other private
> >
> >
> > Other  disciplines using the idea in the research
> >
> >
>  > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> >
> >
>  >
> >
> >
> > Industry/Practice Metrics
>  >
> >
> > Patents issued or filed
> >
>  >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> >
> >  Actual intervention in field or site (Action Research or Design
> >  research)
> >
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
>  >
> >
> > Commercialization of idea into  product/service
> >
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
>  >
> >
> > Startups created based on the idea
>  >
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
>  >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  Influence on Society (qualitative or subjective data)
> >
>  >
> > Benefit of research to scientific community
>  >
> >
> > 1 (low); 2 (medium); 3 (high)
>  >
> >
> > Benefit of research to society at large
>  >
> >
> > 1 (low); 2 (medium); 3 (high)
>  >
> >
> >
> >
> > 100 word explanation  of why this paper is worthy of consideration
> >
> >
>  >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>  >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>  > The panel consist of Prof. Robert M Davison, Prof. Murray Jennex,  
Prof.
> > Niels
> > Bjørn-Andersen, Prof. Steven B Sawyer,  Prof. Juhani Iivari and Prof.
> > Samir
> >  Chatterjee.
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >  Samir
> > --
> > Dr. Samir Chatterjee
> >  Professor
> > School of Information Systems & Technology  Claremont Graduate
> > University
> > 130 East 9th Street,  Claremont, CA 91711
> > (P) 909-607-4651; (cell) 909-730-8898
>  > profsamir1 at gmail.com
> >  https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsites.
>  >  cgu.edu%2fchatterjees%2f&data=01%7c01%7cgalletta%40katz.pitt.edu%7ce06
>  >  71f8217b44b605f3d08d3ba673318%7c9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7c1&s
>  > data=CPR79onIRB85xIIcQdc6bA761puYIDyKg8RHA96yDVY%3d
> >
>  >
> > Director, *Innovations Design Empowerment Applications  Laboratory*
> > (IDEA
> > Labs)
> >  https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.id
>  >  ea-labs.net%2f&data=01%7c01%7cgalletta%40katz.pitt.edu%7ce0671f8217b44
>  >  b605f3d08d3ba673318%7c9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7c1&sdata=yIGuy
>  > 5iXGkQFY2KZovkWpb%2bhp6U8j2IiXryIXhEIOf8%3d
> > Associate  Editor: Health Systems, IJBDCN Editorial Board: Journal of
> >  AIS
> > Member: IEEE (senior), ACM (senior), AIS, AMIA
> >  Author:
> >  https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdesign
>  >  scienceresearch.wordpress.com%2fabout%2f&data=01%7c01%7cgalletta%40kat
>  >  z.pitt.edu%7ce0671f8217b44b605f3d08d3ba673318%7c9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a
>  >  526112fd0d%7c1&sdata=fPX0fjzr9V%2fbizXp%2fTduxdiSkGh0X5Kag6rF9Md8mi4%3
>  > d
> > 2015 Lifetime Achievement Award Winner for Contributions  to Design
> > Science  (by AIS DSR community)
> >  _______________________________________________
> > AISWorld mailing  list
> > AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> AISWorld mailing  list
> AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
>



-- 
Dr. Samir  Chatterjee
Professor
School of Information Systems &  Technology
Claremont Graduate University
130 East 9th Street, Claremont,  CA 91711
(P) 909-607-4651; (cell)  909-730-8898
profsamir1 at gmail.com
http://sites.cgu.edu/chatterjees/

Director,  *Innovations Design Empowerment Applications Laboratory* (IDEA
Labs)  http://www.idea-labs.net/
Associate Editor: Health Systems,  IJBDCN
Editorial Board: Journal of AIS
Member: IEEE (senior), ACM  (senior), AIS, AMIA
Author:  http://designscienceresearch.wordpress.com/about/
2015 Lifetime Achievement  Award Winner for Contributions to Design Science
(by AIS DSR  community)
_______________________________________________
AISWorld  mailing  list
AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org



More information about the AISWorld mailing list