[AISWorld] Influential IS Papers Discourse - Part 3 Nominate papers
Dennis, Alan R.
ardennis at indiana.edu
Wed Aug 3 07:12:28 EDT 2016
I agree that media coverage is an indication that the research has reached the common masses, but I don't think it means it is important. It means it has entertainment value. A few of my articles have gotten media coverage over the years but nothing comes close to 200+ Web, print, radio and TV stories on the Computers and Human Behavior article that Taylor Wells and I published that looked at email and voicemail for romantic communication. Interesting... yes. Important ... not so much.
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: AISWorld [mailto:aisworld-bounces at lists.aisnet.org] On Behalf Of MurphJen at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 3:39 PM
To: profsamir1 at gmail.com; galletta at katz.pitt.edu
Cc: aisworld at lists.aisnet.org
Subject: Re: [AISWorld] Influential IS Papers Discourse - Part 3 Nominate papers
my only comment on media coverage is that it can be biased by a good PR person at the university, by that I mean that a good PR person can push out media releases and such that will get a person interviewed. As an example we have a good a PR person and I typically do a couple of interviews a month on my research or on topics of interest. A little side note is that I did over 100 interviews during the Fukushima nuclear disaster, none tied to my research but all based on my knowledge. I don't count that. On the other hand a student and I did a paper on how to identify victims of human sex trafficking using online advertising and have been interview a few times on it, this would count but I'm not sure it reflects influence but rather an interest in the topic. This is very true for IS security researchers, we have the most interesting research for media coverage....murray jennex
In a message dated 8/2/2016 10:52:33 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, profsamir1 at gmail.com writes:
Dear Dennis, Bill & Manual,
I agree with Dennis that media coverage is a testimony that the work/research has permeated to the common masses, hence it is probably valuable to society.
Manual, I hear what you say however engineering and computer science are very well established disciplines. When we started the discourse on Design Science Research, we wanted to make sure that we as IS community can distinguish what we do from pure CS or Engineering. After all the nexus of DSR comes from Herb Simon's seminal work, emphasizing design. It is obvious that certain engineering theory or hard core technical CS work will not be referenced in DSR specially in the IS context. We as a community should promote problem solving but the source of our problems comes from the intersection of technology, people and organization. That's what distinguishes us. In fact I strongly suggest all senior editors in IS to ask for "what problem did you solve?" in their journal submissions. This can strengthen our field and showing evidence of value becomes easier. DSR is meant to do that as a research method.
Bill, you have a point. I have asked for papers since we know that journal and conference articles are peer reviewed. But you can also propose a book that you think has had influence. There are many other artifacts that have influence but without "peer" review it is difficult to weed out which is good and which is not. For example, someone may write a blog or a newspaper column that actually may be read by more IS folks than some journal papers.
But one could argue that this is his/her opinion. We live and work in a system of "peer review". So as long as your work or artifact has been evaluated by others, please go ahead and submit your nomination.
Sincerely
Samir
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Galletta, Dennis <galletta at katz.pitt.edu>
wrote:
> This is quite interesting. At the risk of beating this to death, as
> some academics do, I think one additional measure should be added:
> Some
measure
> of media coverage. If the media cares about it, then it seems to add
> to
the
> evidence of importance. It could work into your last two measures in
> some way.
>
> I have heard some of Erik Brynjolffsson's work described on NPR. I
thought
> of this mainly because of a few very short news articles from two or
three
> of my experiments in the past, but just look at the scale of Erik's
> coverage! I did a couple of radio interviews on some local stations
> and some excerpts related to a story of this new thing called the Web
> on All Things Considered on NPR back in 1997 or 1998, and even that
> was pretty exciting. I have also seen news reports that relate to work
> by Carol Saunders as well. I'm sure many other IS professors have been
> in the
news,
> too.
>
> Maybe longer into the future, we should consider measures of popular
media
> like books and movies. For instance, A Beautiful Mind, a movie that
> was based on Nash (2001) and, of course, recently the Theory of
> Everything (Hawking). Maybe we will see a movie about UTAUT someday,
> however, having four authors make it more difficult!
>
> DG
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dennis F. Galletta Professor of Business
> Administration
> University of Pittsburgh and Director, Katz Doctoral
> Program
> 282a Mervis Hall Katz Graduate School of
> Business
> Phone +1 412-648-1699 Pittsburgh, PA
> 15260
> E-mail: galletta @ Fax +1
> 412-624-3633
> katz.pitt.edu homepage:
> www.pitt.edu/~galletta
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AISWorld [mailto:aisworld-bounces at lists.aisnet.org] On Behalf
> Of mmora at securenym.net
> Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 7:52 PM
> To: Samir Chatterjee <profsamir1 at gmail.com>
> Cc: ISWorld <aisworld at lists.aisnet.org>
> Subject: Re: [AISWorld] Influential IS Papers Discourse - Part 3
> Nominate papers
>
> Well, an additional evidence on strong bias on our disclipine,
> despite
the
> good wishes, on design research stream: axiomatic design theory (Suh,
> 1990), from MIT, widely used in several engineering fields, including
> software engineering, has been ignored in MIS. This is a problem. Bias
is a
> strong dominant force in our discipline. This book (Suh, 1990)
> qualifies totally the asked metrics but it has been missed in Design
> Research in
MIS.
> Manuel Mora / UAA, Mexico
>
> On Thu, July 28, 2016 1:23 pm, Samir Chatterjee wrote:
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >
> >
> > A small ad hoc panel comprising of IS scholars from all continents
> > have come together to further this important discussion about
> > influence of IS research. Together we have come up with a way to
> > value the impact or influence. The attached PDF file shows the
> > metric but I am also providing it below.
> >
> > We encourage all of you to nominate papers that you think has had
> > tremendous impact or influence to field and society. In order to
> > manage this process and also in lieu of the time and effort that
> > might be required to handle this nomination, please adhere to the
> > following
> rule:
> >
> > 1. Send us a soft copy of the paper (PDF preferred).
> > 2. Fill up the influence metric table as shown.
> > 3. You can self nominate your own paper(s) but no one author can
> > nominate more than 5 of his/her own paper. 4. You must write a 100
> > word explanation of why this paper that you nominated is worthy of
> consideration.
> >
> > Academic Metrics
> >
> >
> > Number of Citations
> >
> >
> > 1 (1-100); 2 (100 – 1000); 3 (1000+)
> >
> >
> > Number of Years since publication
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Perceived quality of the journal/conference
> >
> >
> > 1 (low)’ 2 (medium); 3 (high)
> >
> >
> > External grants funding the research
> >
> >
> > NSF or NIH or DARPA or EU or other private
> >
> >
> > Other disciplines using the idea in the research
> >
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Industry/Practice Metrics
> >
> >
> > Patents issued or filed
> >
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> >
> > Actual intervention in field or site (Action Research or Design
> > research)
> >
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> >
> > Commercialization of idea into product/service
> >
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> >
> > Startups created based on the idea
> >
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Influence on Society (qualitative or subjective data)
> >
> >
> > Benefit of research to scientific community
> >
> >
> > 1 (low); 2 (medium); 3 (high)
> >
> >
> > Benefit of research to society at large
> >
> >
> > 1 (low); 2 (medium); 3 (high)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 100 word explanation of why this paper is worthy of consideration
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The panel consist of Prof. Robert M Davison, Prof. Murray Jennex,
Prof.
> > Niels
> > Bjørn-Andersen, Prof. Steven B Sawyer, Prof. Juhani Iivari and Prof.
> > Samir
> > Chatterjee.
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Samir
> > --
> > Dr. Samir Chatterjee
> > Professor
> > School of Information Systems & Technology Claremont Graduate
> > University
> > 130 East 9th Street, Claremont, CA 91711
> > (P) 909-607-4651; (cell) 909-730-8898
> > profsamir1 at gmail.com
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsites.
> >
> cgu.edu%2fchatterjees%2f&data=01%7c01%7cgalletta%40katz.pitt.edu%7ce06
> >
> 71f8217b44b605f3d08d3ba673318%7c9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7c1&s
> > data=CPR79onIRB85xIIcQdc6bA761puYIDyKg8RHA96yDVY%3d
> >
> >
> > Director, *Innovations Design Empowerment Applications Laboratory*
> > (IDEA
> > Labs)
> >
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.
> > id
> >
> ea-labs.net%2f&data=01%7c01%7cgalletta%40katz.pitt.edu%7ce0671f8217b44
> >
> b605f3d08d3ba673318%7c9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a526112fd0d%7c1&sdata=yIGuy
> > 5iXGkQFY2KZovkWpb%2bhp6U8j2IiXryIXhEIOf8%3d
> > Associate Editor: Health Systems, IJBDCN Editorial Board: Journal
> > of AIS
> > Member: IEEE (senior), ACM (senior), AIS, AMIA
> > Author:
> >
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdesi
> > gn
> >
> scienceresearch.wordpress.com%2fabout%2f&data=01%7c01%7cgalletta%40kat
> >
> z.pitt.edu%7ce0671f8217b44b605f3d08d3ba673318%7c9ef9f489e0a04eeb87cc3a
> >
> 526112fd0d%7c1&sdata=fPX0fjzr9V%2fbizXp%2fTduxdiSkGh0X5Kag6rF9Md8mi4%3
> > d
> > 2015 Lifetime Achievement Award Winner for Contributions to Design
> > Science (by AIS DSR community)
> > _______________________________________________
> > AISWorld mailing list
> > AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AISWorld mailing list
> AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
>
--
Dr. Samir Chatterjee
Professor
School of Information Systems & Technology Claremont Graduate University
130 East 9th Street, Claremont, CA 91711
(P) 909-607-4651; (cell) 909-730-8898
profsamir1 at gmail.com
http://sites.cgu.edu/chatterjees/
Director, *Innovations Design Empowerment Applications Laboratory* (IDEA
Labs) http://www.idea-labs.net/
Associate Editor: Health Systems, IJBDCN Editorial Board: Journal of AIS
Member: IEEE (senior), ACM (senior), AIS, AMIA
Author: http://designscienceresearch.wordpress.com/about/
2015 Lifetime Achievement Award Winner for Contributions to Design Science (by AIS DSR community) _______________________________________________
AISWorld mailing list
AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
_______________________________________________
AISWorld mailing list
AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
More information about the AISWorld
mailing list