[AISWorld] [External] Re: "IS not capable of coming up with native theories" says its senior scholar
Land,F
F.Land at lse.ac.uk
Mon Dec 13 15:32:06 EST 2021
Just one more word:
A theory is just a well founded conjecture and has no validity until it can be turned into a law by the requisite evidence for its truth can be found.
Frank
-----Original Message-----
From: AISWorld <aisworld-bounces at lists.aisnet.org> On Behalf Of Nik Rushdi Hassan
Sent: 13 December 2021 19:33
To: Shailendra Palvia <Shailendra.Palvia at liu.edu>
Cc: AISWorld <aisworld at lists.aisnet.org>
Subject: Re: [AISWorld] [External] Re: "IS not capable of coming up with native theories" says its senior scholar
In response to Shailendra's question, here's a definition of theory from Shirley Gregor that I like: "abstract entities that aim to describe, explain, and enhance understanding of the world and, in some cases, to provide predictions of what will happen in the future and to give a basis for intervention and action.” What's nice about this one is that if you can describe something that others are not able to describe well, we have a theory. E.g. in 1953 the theory about the structure of the DNA was published and fast forward 70 years, we are able to develop vaccines in 11 months compared to decades in the past because of that theory (umm...
knowledge).
Best wishes
Nik
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:34 AM Shailendra Palvia < Shailendra.Palvia at liu.edu> wrote:
> Somebody said - "My 5 cents."
>
> I will say -- my 2 cents.
>
> Will somebody, once for all define, what is theory? Why are we so
> obsessed with theory creation and that too native theory creation?
>
> Let us continue to advance knowledge in our discipline as we have been
> doing. Interdisciplinary or Native theories will emerge for sure.
>
> Sincerely
>
> ...Shailendra
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AISWorld <aisworld-bounces at lists.aisnet.org> On Behalf Of
> Prashant Palvia
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 9:57 AM
> To: AISWorld <aisworld at lists.aisnet.org>
> Subject: Re: [AISWorld] [External] Re: "IS not capable of coming up
> with native theories" says its senior scholar
>
> WARNING: This email originated from outside of Long Island University.
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender
> and know the content is safe. - LIU Information Technology
>
> The overreliance on or the "fetish" for theories in the IS discipline
> is doing more harm than good to the IS discipline. I will put the
> blame where it belongs. It is on the top journals in the field.
> Everyone knows what they are and I don't need to name these journals.
> Sadly, other journals are beginning to copy them. The focus should
> always be on "knowledge" creation and there are multiple ways of doing it.
>
> I know I will be attacked. But someone has to speak up. I hope others
> will join my call to bring the focus back on knowledge creation and
> move away from any single paradigm.
>
> With best wishes for the holiday season,
>
> Prashant
>
> *Prashant Palvia, Ph.D.*
>
> *Joe Rosenthal Excellence Professor*
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 8:35 PM Varun Grover <VGrover at walton.uark.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > I agree with Nik and Kalle. Good theories explain and predict (not
> > only
> > predict) -- and the question of retrofitting theories from outside
> > the field to explain IS phenomena as we have done for many years vs.
> > expending more energy in developing unique insight about our
> > idiosyncratic digital phenomena is a reasonable one. Perhaps for
> > our socio-technical bridging there is a place for both -- but I
> > suspect that we are going through critical phase that demands deeper
> > thinking
> > - frameworks, models, theories about digital.... I'm encouraged by
> > the
> way the field is responding.
> > Varun
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: AISWorld <aisworld-bounces at lists.aisnet.org> On Behalf Of Nik
> > Rushdi Hassan
> > Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 6:24 PM
> > To: Kalle Lyytinen <kjl13 at case.edu>
> > Cc: AISWorld <aisworld at lists.aisnet.org>
> > Subject: Re: [AISWorld] [External] Re: "IS not capable of coming up
> > with native theories" says its senior scholar
> >
> > Dear all,
> > Interesting discussions folks. Quite revealing!
> > My two cents (even cheaper than Kalle's 5 cents) opinion revolves
> > around the notion of "native" theory, which is the same thing as
> > saying
> "original"
> > theories from the IS field, as opposed to derivative, borrowed
> > theories that are rather prevalent. We want native theories because
> > we think we have the unique training and capabilities to bridge the
> > technical and the social (see Supra's sociotechnical axes of
> > cohesion article in MISQ) and therefore offer solutions (Mikko's
> > empirical
> > successes) that other disciplines might not be able to address. The
> > division of labor of expertise has always worked that way since time
> > immemorial. The question is, if we are in an interdisciplinary team
> > with other disciplines, how do we articulate what we bring to the
> > plate by way of expertise? That's where native theories come into
> picture.
> > Nik
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 2:59 PM Kalle Lyytinen <kjl13 at case.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > My five cents on this which we have elaborated in our 2015 piece
> > > with Varun and forthcoming piece in JIT. The reason for ‘inviting’
> > > native theory is not the reason to have just one ( though you can
> > > make institutional and political claims why this matters) but that
> > > they have poor accuracy in explaining and or predicting Digital
> phenomena.
> > > Whether we call them IS specific is secondary- most of the
> > > argument about native theory is not so much about owning it but
> > > explain understand and predict new types of digital phenomena.
> > >
> > > — Kalle
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On Dec 12, 2021, at 2:49 PM, Jeet Gupta <guptaj at uah.edu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello Mikko and Nik:
> > > >
> > > > Are you suggesting that empirical success cannot be "native" theory?
> > > > Consider for example, some of the work of the early philosophers
> > > > whose concepts and theories were based on empirical observations.
> > > > Would their theories won't be considered "native"? Even
> > > > Newton's theory of
> > > gravitation
> > > > was based on his empirical observation of the falling apple from
> > > > a
> > tree.
> > > >
> > > > Thus, I think we do need to think about these aspects. Of
> > > > course it
> > > still
> > > > is an open question if the IS discipline is ready for a formal
> > > > theory, native or not; but to success that empirical theory
> > > > building cannot be
> > > based
> > > > on or lead to "native" theories seems far fetched.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Jatinder (Jeet) N. D. Gupta, PhD, CFPIM Director, Integrated
> > > > Enterprise Lab Eminent Scholar and Professor College of Business
> > > > The University of Alabama in Huntsville
> > > > 301 Sparkman Drive
> > > > Huntsville, AL 35899
> > > > Phone: 256-824-6593 (office)
> > > > 256-520-0175 (cell)
> > > > FAX: 256-824-6328
> > > > E-mail: guptaj at uah.edu
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: AISWorld <aisworld-bounces at lists.aisnet.org> On Behalf Of
> > > > Siponen, Mikko
> > > > Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2021 2:23 PM
> > > > To: Nik Rushdi Hassan <nhassan at d.umn.edu>
> > > > Cc: AISWorld <aisworld at lists.aisnet.org>
> > > > Subject: [External] Re: [AISWorld] "IS not capable of coming up
> > > > with
> > > native
> > > > theories" says its senior scholar
> > > >
> > > > Hi Nik
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for asking. To quickly make a long story very short:
> > > >
> > > > 1) The role of “native” theories is overplayed in Organizational
> > > > and Management Research as well as in IS. The philosophy of
> > > > science does not suggest that the success of sciences or
> > > > disciplines (in
> > > > general) is
> > > related
> > > > to the “native” theories. Lets give a simple example familiar
> > > > with most
> > > > people:
> > > > - e.g. for Covid vaccines: Which one of you asked, when taking
> > > > the
> > > vaccine,
> > > > if it was based on a “native theory”? I bet you did not ask this.
> > > >
> > > > For Covid vaccines, the issue is not to ask "did anyone develop
> > > > a
> > > ‘native’”
> > > > theory, but to ask the degree of EMPIRICAL SUCCESS, i.e., how
> > > successfully
> > > > are these vaccines. In this specific case, you may want to have
> > > > high
> > > Average
> > > > Treatment Effect (ATF; usually presented as statistical
> > > > generalisation of the predictive effect, e.g., 60% effect),
> > > > minimal side effects, long time effect window, etc. Further, you
> > > > would like to know the empirical
> > > success of
> > > > each vaccine against different virus variants. These matters -
> > > > not
> > > whether
> > > > there was (or was not) a “native theory”.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2) usually (in the philosophy of science) fundamental scientific
> > > > goals relate to “understanding”, OR “explanation” OR “prediction”.
> > > > E.g. again,
> > > we
> > > > want to know the empirical success of a CoVid vaccine as
> > > > illustrated
> > > above,
> > > > which is predictive success. IF e.g. predictive success is the
> > > fundamental
> > > > scientific goal, as it is often the case in applied sciences,
> > > > then (to
> > > > simplify) this is what matters. If a “non-native” theory offers
> > > > a better track record of EMPIRICAL SUCCESS for some phenomenon,
> > > > then we go with
> > > it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > By and large, e.g. medical research did not became successful by
> > > developing
> > > > native theories, but with a track record of empirical success.
> > > >
> > > > IS community has a lot of competence. But is the search for
> > > > “native theories” the best way to use this competence? If IS is
> > > > an applied field, perhaps we should put our key focus on
> > > > empirical
> success.
> > > > Later we will
> > > see
> > > > if “native” theories offer better empirical success in different
> > > > IS cases than non-native theory.
> > > >
> > > > This is the short story, from a less senior IS scholar....
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mikko Siponen
> > > > D. Soc. Sc., Ph.D.
> > > > Member of the Finnish Academy of Science and Letters Professor
> > > > of Information Systems University of Jyväskylä Tel. +358
> > > > 505588128
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12. Dec 2021, at 17.43, Nik Rushdi Hassan
> > > > <nhassan at d.umn.edu<mailto:nhassan at d.umn.edu>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear colleagues,
> > > > A very distinguished senior IS scholar who has a long string of
> > > > accomplishments including chief editorship of top IS journals
> > > > shared
> > > with me
> > > > that "I have been doubtful that the IS discipline can come up
> > > > with Native Theories. I believe that the IS discipline is simply
> > > > not ready, not yet sufficiently developed to come up with Native
> Theories."
> > > > Today, the SIGPHIL at ICIS workshop that starts at 1pm CST
> > > > virtually on Zoom addresses that claim, one way or another. Will
> > > > the list of work-in-progress papers, mostly by younger
> > > > researchers, vying for a place in the Journal of Information
> > > > Technology Special Issue on Products of Theorizing:
> > > > Towards Native Theories of
> > > Emerging
> > > > IT
> > > > show that we just don't have what it takes?
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Nik Rushdi Hassan, PhD and Assoc. Professor of MIS Labovitz
> > > > School of Business and Economics University of Minnesota Duluth
> > > > 1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 385A
> > > > Duluth MN 55812
> > > > Office Phone: (218) 726-7453
> > > > Fax: (218) 726-7578
> > > > Home Page:
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Nik Rushdi Hassan, PhD and Assoc. Professor of MIS Labovitz School
> > of Business and Economics University of Minnesota Duluth
> > 1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 385A
> > Duluth MN 55812
> > Office Phone: (218) 726-7453
> > Fax: (218) 726-7578
> > Home Page:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlo
> > ok
> > .com/?url=http*3A*2F*2Fwww.d.umn.edu*2F*nhassan&data=04*7C01*7CV
> > Gr
> > over*40walton.uark.edu*7Cd89375457d0947302e4008d9bdcf2127*7C79c742c4
> > e6
> > 1c4fa5be89a3cb566a80d1*7C0*7C0*7C637749519581850014*7CUnknown*7CTWFp
> > bG
> > Zsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn
> > 0*
> > 3D*7C3000&sdata=DeE3MW7mqaPWy2XFAiHJZkAixh5EoIHvxmzTZ2KTt3c*3D&a
> > mp
> > ;reserved=0__;JSUlJX4lJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUl!!DeIc-uvKXH9G!tw0eb_51N4bzw5J
> > My tYeBcjdx6_Eu93iTk9IQqCNsH1AygOMAozIng4RoimQTEA$
> > Email: nhassan at d.umn.edu
> > LinkedIn:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlo
> > ok
> > .com/?url=http*3A*2F*2Fwww.linkedin.com*2Fin*2Fnikrushdi*2F&data
> > =0
> > 4*7C01*7CVGrover*40walton.uark.edu*7Cd89375457d0947302e4008d9bdcf212
> > 7*
> > 7C79c742c4e61c4fa5be89a3cb566a80d1*7C0*7C0*7C637749519581850014*7CUn
> > kn
> > own*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haW
> > wi
> > LCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C3000&sdata=OOjAZ3CqrAB4CG3hwoOI9YHb0y8cZi2cn6ej
> > 3X
> > 60VKs*3D&reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!DeIc-uvKXH9G!t
> > w0 eb_51N4bzw5JMytYeBcjdx6_Eu93iTk9IQqCNsH1AygOMAozIng4Rp7nCMBs$
> > _______________________________________________
> > AISWorld mailing list
> > AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > AISWorld mailing list
> > AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AISWorld mailing list
> AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
> _______________________________________________
> AISWorld mailing list
> AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
>
--
Nik Rushdi Hassan, PhD and Assoc. Professor of MIS Labovitz School of Business and Economics University of Minnesota Duluth
1318 Kirby Drive, LSBE 385A
Duluth MN 55812
Office Phone: (218) 726-7453
Fax: (218) 726-7578
Home Page: www.d.umn.edu/~nhassan
Email: nhassan at d.umn.edu
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/nikrushdi/ _______________________________________________
AISWorld mailing list
AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
More information about the AISWorld
mailing list