[AISWorld] Conceptual Modelling in the “Digital First” Era at ECIS 2022

Mon Feb 28 04:46:18 EST 2022

Dear Colleagues,

We hope this message finds you well!

We welcome your submissions to “Conceptual Modelling in the “Digital First” Era — A Joint AIS SIGSAND/SIGPrag Workshop” at ECIS 2022!

Relevant dates

Initial submissions due: 20 March 2022
Review decisions: 30 April 2022
Revised papers due: May 2022
Workshop date: June 20, 2022 (full-day)

Chairs:

Pär J. Ågerfalk, Uppsala University, Sweden
Roman Lukyanenko, HEC Montréal, Canada
Jan Recker, University of Hamburg, Germany

Submission details:

For submission details, including the paper template, please visit:
https://sigsand.com/sigsand-sigprag-2022/

Submit your paper(s) to: par.agerfalk at im.uu.se<javascript:;>

Workshop background. Conceptual modelling emerged during the early years of the information systems (IS) discipline. Ever since, it has stood as a core theme of IS scholarship, providing an essential constellation of methods, tools, and theories to understand and support IS development. Although significant progress has been made over the years (Wand & Weber, 2017), conceptual modelling is still widely associated with “traditional” systems, such as enterprise systems, and with separation between technology and social actors (Boell and Cecez-Kecmanovic, 2015). In this traditional view, information systems are seen as representations of an external domain or universe of discourse, which are used to inform users about the state of the “real world” outside the system (Recker et al., 2019).

Recently, IS scholars have raised concerns about the applicability of conceptual modelling in the contemporary environment where activities are often performed online and where our experiences are increasingly mediated through digital technology. This new environment has been conceptualised as a “digital first” era, in which our world is increasingly shaped by what happens in digital domains rather than the other way around. Digital first calls for an “ontological reversal” (Baskerville et al., 2020) and a rethinking of the nature of the relationships between the digital, the material, and the social (Zammuto et al., 2007; Yoo et al., 2010; Aakhus et al., 2014; Cecez-Kecmanovic et al., 2014; Eriksson & Ågerfalk, 2021).

IS research has started to examine the profound changes that a digital first era brings. Still, their implications for conceptual modelling research and practice have not yet received the same attention (Recker et al., 2021). For example, digital practices rely on “institutional facts” (Searle, 2006) established through digital technology (Ågerfalk, 2010; Iannacci, 2010; March

& Allen, 2014; Eriksson & Ågerfalk, 2021). These practices emerge not only through human intervention and action but also, and increasingly, by artificial intelligence, machine learning, and autonomous technologies (Berente et al., 2021), typically driven by big data analytics (Ågerfalk, 2020). The emergence of these practices spawns fundamental questions about conceptual modelling, including:

  *   How can conceptual modelling be used to understand and shape this new and emerging context?
  *   How can conceptual models be used to reason, analyse, or design such practices?
  *   Does conceptual modelling have a role to play in understanding the broader societal implications of digitalisation?
  *   To what extent does conceptual modelling scholarship itself need to change to adapt to and account for the ontological reversal in the digital first era?

This workshop aims to bring together academic thought-leaders to exchange ideas and potential answers to these questions. Our goal is to bring together the many different areas and perspectives of conceptual modelling scholarship and work together towards a relevant research agenda for the future of conceptual modelling that continues its existing cumulative tradition and accounts for changes in reality and the role that digital systems play within our experiences.

The desired outcome is a joint paper detailing the results and research agenda (targeted for a top IS journal). The co-chairs will invite all participants to contribute. The chairs will also aim to recommend accepted papers to relevant journals and help authors contact editors if needed. Reviews of position papers will follow a double blind peer review process.

Please submit your position papers to par.agerfalk at im.uu.se<javascript:;>.

References

Aakhus, M., Ågerfalk, P. J., Lyytinen, K., & Te’eni, D. (2014). Symbolic action research in information systems: Introduction to the special issue. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1187–1200.

Ågerfalk, P. (2010). Getting Pragmatic. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3), 251-256.

Ågerfalk, P. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence as digital agency. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(1), 1–8.

Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D., & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 44(2), 509–523.

Berente, N., Gu, B., Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing Artificial Intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433-1450.

Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). What is an information system? In 48th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), ieeexplore.ieee.org, pp. 4959–4968.

Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Galliers, R. D., Henfridsson, O., Newell, S., & Vidgen, R. (2014). The sociomateriality of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 809-830.

Eriksson, O., & Ågerfalk, P. J. (2021). Speaking things into existence: ontological foundations of identity representation and management. Information Systems Journal, in press.

Iannacci, F. (2010). When is an information infrastructure? Investigating the emergence of public sector information infrastructures. European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12330

March, S. T., & Allen, G. N. (2014). Toward a social ontology for conceptual modeling. Communications of the AIS, 34, 1347–1358.

Recker, J. C., Lukyanenko, R., Jabbari Sabegh, M., Samuel, B., & Castellanos, A. (2021). From representation to mediation: a new agenda for conceptual modeling research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 269-300.

Recker, J., Indulska, M., Green, P., Burton-Jones, A., & Weber, R. (2019). Information Systems as Representations: A Review of the Theory and Evidence. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(6), 735-786.

Searle, J. R. (2006). Social ontology: Some basic principles. Anthropological Theory, 6(1), 12–29.

Wand, Y., & Weber, R. (2017). Thirty years later: Some reflections on ontological analysis in conceptual modeling. Journal of Database Management, 28(1), 1–17.

Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724-735.

Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749-762.
We look forward to your submissions!

Best regards,
Roman

Roman Lukyanenko
Associate professor
Department of Information Technologies
HEC Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, https://www.hec.ca/

President, AIS SIGSAND, www.sigsand.com<http://www.sigsand.com/>
IVADO Professor, https://ivado.ca<https://ivado.ca/>
ResearchGate<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roman_Lukyanenko>

[Shape, rectangle  Description automatically generated]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 289 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.aisnet.org/pipermail/aisworld_lists.aisnet.org/attachments/20220228/b548e1b0/attachment.png>