[AISWorld] Influential IS Papers Discourse - Part 3 Nominate papers

[Manuel Mora]

Murray, it is positive. However, software engineering is the less
engineering (none use equations, numerical methods, or even decision-making
procedures for instance in AKM topic at present in the most practice vs
other engineering field like your BSc). On Design Research, you can also
refer to big omission on Axiomatic Design theory, actually for mechanical
engineering and available from the 1990. Other example, MISQ published in
1999 a paper on SwE by using System Dynamics for PM issues but the same
author had published its core ideas in 1989! So my critique and concerns on
a real involvement in a systems engineering viewpoint. Anyway, the bias is
the rule in MIS research. Manuel
PS my BS is on computer systems 84, MSc on AI 89, and EngD 03, and my
involvement in computer field is since 1976 programming Basic in Commodore
pc (from a friend by the way!) in high school level in Mexico.
On Aug 2, 2016 7:36 AM, <MurphJen at aol.com> wrote:

> Manuel,
>
> I hope to reassure you.  Although my PhD is in MIS I have a MS in software
> engineering as well as having spent 20 years as a mechanical/nuclear
> engineer in the US Navy and the civilian nuclear industry.  I got into MIS
> by pioneering the use of the PC. LANs, and sensors in nuclear plants for
> doing testing.  I'm also well versed as a practitioner as I have
> traditional engineering certification (I'm a Professional Engineer,
> Mechanical in the state of California), industry certified in IS security
> (I have the CISSP and CSSLP), and in project management (PMP).
> Additionally I have undergraduate degrees in chemistry and physics and am
> the editor in chief of the International Journal of Knowledge Management
> and co-editor in chief of the International Journal of Information Systems
> for Crisis Response and Management so I have more interdisciplinary
> background than most.  Hope this helps...murray jennex
>
> In a message dated 8/1/2016 10:54:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> dr.manuel.mora.uaa at gmail.com writes:
>
> Samir, you are missed researchers trained in engineering (exception by you)
> issues in this ad hoc panel. Design research is older than reported in MIS
> published papers. However, the posited structure of metrics looks good.
> Best success with this effort! It is necessary to reimpulse our discipline,
> Manuel
> On Aug 1, 2016 7:27 PM, "Samir Chatterjee" <profsamir1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >
> > A small ad hoc panel comprising of IS scholars from all continents have
> > come together to further this important discussion about influence of IS
> > research. Together we have come up with a way to value the impact or
> > influence. The attached PDF file shows the metric but I am also providing
> > it below.
> >
> > We encourage all of you to nominate papers that you think has had
> > tremendous impact or influence to field and society. In order to manage
> > this process and also in lieu of the time and effort that might be
> required
> > to handle this nomination, please adhere to the following rule:
> >
> > 1. Send us a soft copy of the paper (PDF preferred).
> > 2. Fill up the influence metric table as shown.
> > 3. You can self nominate your own paper(s) but no one author can nominate
> > more than 5 of his/her own paper.
> > 4. You must write a 100 word explanation of why this paper that you
> > nominated is worthy of consideration.
> >
> > Academic Metrics
> >
> > Number of Citations
> >
> > 1 (1-100); 2 (100 – 1000); 3 (1000+)
> >
> > Number of Years since publication
> >
> >
> >
> > Perceived quality of the journal/conference
> >
> > 1 (low)’ 2 (medium); 3 (high)
> >
> > External grants funding the research
> >
> > NSF or NIH or DARPA or EU or other private
> >
> > Other disciplines using the idea in the research
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Industry/Practice Metrics
> >
> > Patents issued or filed
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> > Actual intervention in field or site (Action Research or Design research)
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> > Commercialization of idea into product/service
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> > Startups created based on the idea
> >
> > Yes (1); No (0)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Influence on Society (qualitative or subjective data)
> >
> > Benefit of research to scientific community
> >
> > 1 (low); 2 (medium); 3 (high)
> >
> > Benefit of research to society at large
> >
> > 1 (low); 2 (medium); 3 (high)
> >
> >
> >
> > 100 word explanation of why this paper is worthy of consideration
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The panel consist of Prof. Robert M Davison, Prof. Murray Jennex, Prof.
> > Niels
> > Bjørn-Andersen, Prof. Steven B Sawyer, Prof. Juhani Iivari and Prof.
> Samir
> > Chatterjee.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Samir
> > --
> > Dr. Samir Chatterjee
> > Professor
> > School of Information Systems & Technology
> > Claremont Graduate University
> > 130 East 9th Street, Claremont, CA 91711
> > (P) 909-607-4651; (cell) 909-730-8898
> > profsamir1 at gmail.com
> > http://sites.cgu.edu/chatterjees/
> >
> > Director, *Innovations Design Empowerment Applications Laboratory* (IDEA
> > Labs) http://www.idea-labs.net/
> > Associate Editor: Health Systems, IJBDCN
> > Editorial Board: Journal of AIS
> > Member: IEEE (senior), ACM (senior), AIS, AMIA
> > Author: http://designscienceresearch.wordpress.com/about/
> > 2015 Lifetime Achievement Award Winner for Contributions to Design
> Science
> > (by AIS DSR community)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AISWorld mailing list
> > AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> AISWorld mailing list
> AISWorld at lists.aisnet.org
>
>